WebHe relied on S vChogugudza 1996 (1) ZLR 28 (S) where the following appears at p30 E-F): “… before the State could rely on the presumption in s 15 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, it would have to show: (a) that the accused was a public officer; (b) that in the course of his employment or in breach of his duty; WebIn S v. Takaendesa 1972 (1) RLR 162, Beadle CJ referred to “the elementary rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and cited, with approval, ... Thus, in S v. Masiriva 1990 (1) ZLR 373, where the court was called upon to interpret section 46(4) of the Road Traffic Act ...

The General Rules of Interpretation PDF Statutory ... - Scribd

Web(messenger of the Magistrate’s Court, Durban v Pillay). In Bezuidenhout v AA Mutual Insurance Association Ltd, for example, the court found that “shall” is a strong indication that the provision is peremptory. 7. In S v Takaendesa this principle was explained as follows: “where a statute prohibits the doing of something unless something In S v. Takaendesa 1972 (1) RLR 162, Beadle CJ referred to “the elementary rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and cited, with approval, the excerpt from Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes. The quotation adopted by the Chief Justice continues, “Where, by the use of clear and unequivocal language capable of only one meaning ... computer gaming zone near me

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses

WebTherefore, the judgment in S v Takaendesa 1972 (4) SA 72 (RAD) 78C–D becomes more acceptable where it is stated that “it is a general rule of interpretation that the provisions … Web15 S v Takaendesa 1972 (4) SA 72 (RAD). 16 Amalgated Packaging Industries v Hutt 1975 (4) 943 (A). 17 Johannesburg City Council v Arumugan 1961 (3) SA 748 (W). http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANWHC/2024/77.pdf computer gaming with kids